Repository navigation
Conversation
This branch has not been deployed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Frontend only: match by name instead of recording
sourceBenefitIdin the backend. The first plan added asourceBenefitIdfield on the backend. The issue is labeled good first issue, frontend and quick win, so we scaled it back. Matching by name needs no backend change and also works for benefits imported before this change. The trade-offs:Left out for now:
sourceBenefitIdapproach, which could be a follow-up issue if renames turn out to confuse people.GitHub Issue: #571
Verification
Documentation impact