Skip to content

Run Java Lambda system tests in tracer CI - #13056

Merged
gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d[bot] merged 3 commits into
masterfrom
clara.poncet/java-lambda-ci
Oct 27, 2026
Merged

gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d[bot] merged 3 commits into
masterfrom
clara.poncet/java-lambda-ci

Conversation

@claponcet

@claponcet claponcet commented Oct 26, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What Does This Do

Run the system-tests workflow for both java and java_lambda against the agent built by the current CI run. Upload an agent-only artifact for Lambda, leaving the existing artifact (agent and OpenFeature JARs) unchanged for regular Java. Keep both matrix jobs running if either fails, and include both in the existing success gate.

Motivation

Add Lambda regression coverage to the Java tracer pipeline across API Gateway REST/HTTP, ALB single/multi-value headers, and Function URLs. The existing tracer-release group selects the Lambda scenarios.

Additional Notes

DataDog/system-tests#8128 is merged, activating the tests and updating the weblog. This workflow continues to use system-tests main.

All five Lambda profiles passed in CI: 297 tests passed, with no unexpected failures or XPASS. Expected xfails/skips remain; inferred-spans currently has no enabled tests.

Contributor Checklist

Jira ticket: APPSEC-71301

@claponcet claponcet added type: feature Enhancements and improvements comp: testing Testing tag: no release notes Changes to exclude from release notes inst: aws lambda AWS Lambda instrumentation tag: ai generated Largely based on code generated by an AI or LLM labels Oct 26, 2026
@datadog-datadog-prod-us1-2

This comment has been minimized.

@dd-octo-sts

dd-octo-sts Bot commented Oct 26, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🟢 Java Benchmark SLOs — All performance SLOs passed

Suite Status
Startup 🟢 pass

SLO thresholds are defined here based on automatically generated metrics. A warning is raised when results are within 5% of the threshold.

PR vs. master results
Scenario Candidate master Δ (95% CI of mean)
startup:insecure-bank:iast:Agent 13.89 s 13.93 s [-1.0%; +0.4%] (no difference)
startup:insecure-bank:tracing:Agent 12.89 s 12.99 s [-1.5%; -0.1%] (maybe better)
startup:petclinic:appsec:Agent 17.26 s 17.07 s [+0.1%; +2.1%] (maybe worse)
startup:petclinic:iast:Agent 17.15 s 17.12 s [-0.7%; +1.0%] (no difference)
startup:petclinic:profiling:Agent 16.56 s 16.93 s [-3.1%; -1.2%] (significantly better)
startup:petclinic:sca:Agent 17.14 s 16.99 s [-0.1%; +1.8%] (no difference)
startup:petclinic:tracing:Agent 16.28 s 16.26 s [-0.7%; +0.9%] (no difference)

Commit: bfde47d3 · CI Pipeline · Benchmarking Platform UI


Load and DaCapo benchmarks can be triggered manually in the GitLab pipeline. Results will appear in the Benchmarking Platform UI after completion.

@claponcet
claponcet marked this pull request as ready for review October 27, 2026 13:30
@claponcet
claponcet requested a review from a team as a code owner October 27, 2026 13:30
@claponcet
claponcet requested review from amarziali and removed request for a team October 27, 2026 13:30
@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Oct 27, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-10-27T13:32:19.508523Z bfde47d Draft marked ready
🔒 Security Review ✅ Completed 2026-10-27T13:35:05.879486Z bfde47d Draft marked ready
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@datadog-datadog-prod-us1-2 datadog-datadog-prod-us1-2 Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Bits Code Review: PASS

More details

The Lambda job receives the agent-only artifact, while regular Java retains its existing artifact. Matrix failure handling and the shared success gate are consistent with requiring both variants to succeed; no actionable defect was identified.

Was this helpful? React 👍 or 👎

Open Bits AI session

🤖 Bits Code Review · Commit bfde47d

@amarziali amarziali left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

looks ok

@claponcet
claponcet added this pull request to the merge queue Oct 27, 2026
@dd-octo-sts

dd-octo-sts Bot commented Oct 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/merge

@gh-worker-devflow-routing-ef8351

gh-worker-devflow-routing-ef8351 Bot commented Oct 27, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

View all feedbacks in Devflow UI.

2026-10-27 14:06:51 UTC ℹ️ Start processing command /merge


2026-10-27 14:06:55 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: pull request added to the queue

The expected merge time in master is approximately 1h (p90).


2026-10-27 15:38:44 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: This merge request was merged

@github-merge-queue
github-merge-queue Bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Oct 27, 2026
@gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d
gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d Bot merged commit 691d7e5 into master Oct 27, 2026
629 checks passed
@gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d
gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d Bot deleted the clara.poncet/java-lambda-ci branch October 27, 2026 15:38
@github-actions github-actions Bot added this to the 1.69.0 milestone Oct 27, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

comp: testing Testing inst: aws lambda AWS Lambda instrumentation tag: ai generated Largely based on code generated by an AI or LLM tag: no release notes Changes to exclude from release notes type: feature Enhancements and improvements

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants