Fix scan from a uv workspace member dir (#1138)

[Mikola Lysenko (mikolalysenko)]

LLM Description written by Claude Code:claude-opus-5-5

Fixes #1138

Summary

A scan run from a uv workspace member (--cwd packages/a, or a shell in that directory) never saw the workspace root's uv.lock. When the member had any Hatch configuration (the hatchling backend uv init --package scaffolds before uv 0.8, a hatch.toml, a [tool.hatch.*] table), both modes rewrote it as a lockless Hatch project and exited 0 success. The root uv.lock went stale, uv sync --frozen installed the unpatched release, and vendored vex attested not_affected.

Root cause

vendor/pypi.rs detect_pypi_flavor and the hosted Hatch rewrite look only at the project directory. hosted/governing_root.rs refusal (the governing-root pre-check for npm-family, pnpm, vlt and cargo members) had no uv arm.

Fix

• New utils::uv_workspace::governing_uv_workspace(dir) follows uv's discovery. It returns the governing workspace root when dir holds a pyproject.toml and the nearest ancestor pyproject.toml declaring [tool.uv.workspace] lists it in members and not in exclude. The nearest workspace decides, and an ancestor standalone [project] with no workspace ends the walk (Bugbot). Locks left in the member don't exempt it, because uv never reads them (Bugbot). Globs go through the shared workspace_globs::glob_matches.
• Hosted: governing_root::refusal gets a pypi arm that refuses with redirect_workspace_lockfile_elsewhere before any takeover or write (dry runs included; exit 1, status: "error").
• Vendored: detect_pypi_flavor refuses with pypi_uv_workspace_unsupported (the code a run from the workspace root already gets) before any flavor routing.
• The message names the workspace root and its lock. It also says uv workspaces aren't patched from their root yet, so it doesn't send the user to a run that would also be refused.
• CLI_CONTRACT.md (governing-root row) and docs/testing/uv-compatibility.md are updated.

Tests (red → green)

Case	Test	Before	After
hosted + vendored scan from a hatchling member, and from a member with only hatch.toml (the follow-up comment's trigger): refused, every file byte-identical	mode_migration_pypi::uv_workspace_hatch_member_is_refused_in_both_modes	FAILED (hosted exit 0, member rewritten)	ok
membership rules: listed / excluded / unlisted / root itself / stray member locks / no pyproject; nearest workspace decides; intermediate [project] boundary	utils::uv_workspace::tests::* (3)	new	ok

Red was verified by short-circuiting governing_uv_workspace to None.

Commands run

• cargo test -p socket-patch-core --lib: 6111 passed
• cargo test -p socket-patch-cli --test mode_migration_pypi --test in_process_vendor_pypi_takeover --test in_process_get_hosted_ecosystems --test e2e_vendor_pypi_build: 47 + 6 + 10 + 44 passed
• cargo clippy --workspace --all-features -- -D warnings: clean. cargo fmt --all -- --check: my files clean (the upstream/mod.rs diff is pre-existing on main)

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

[Mikola Lysenko (mikolalysenko)]

BugBot review

[cursor]

Cursor Bugbot has reviewed your changes using high effort and found 2 potential issues.

^{Bugbot Autofix is ON. A cloud agent has been kicked off to fix the reported issues.}

Comment @cursor review or bugbot run to trigger another review on this PR

^{Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 56d1f6d. Configure here.}

[Mikola Lysenko (mikolalysenko)]

[final reviewer] Auto-merge is off. Tanmay Singla (@Tanmay182003), one non-merge commit landed after your approval at 56d1f6dd:

• d0a87ca5 Follow uv workspace discovery for member scans (utils/uv_workspace.rs, vendor/pypi.rs, CLI_CONTRACT.md, uv-compatibility doc, +67/-33)

ci-ok is red on this head and 2 review threads are open. Please re-look at that commit once it's green.

---

Generated by Claude Code