licenses GPLv3+ and LGPLv3+ are not detected

[rakeshbalusa]

OS: windows 7 64 bit
I've updated my scancode to the latest version available.
file : msgbox.txt

scancode output :
Path                                        What    Start Line  End Line        Info
C:/doc/temporary/issue_files/msgbox.py      License          5  6           MPL 1.1

In line 3 of the above file GPLv3+ and LGPLv3+ are mentioned but there were no results from scancode.
Mozilla Public License in line 8 is ignored which is in the for a URL - http://www.mozilla.org/MPL/

License text from the file :

# Version: MPL 1.1 / GPLv3+ / LGPLv3+
#
# The contents of this file are subject to the Mozilla Public License Version
#1.1 (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with
# the License or as specified alternatively below. You may obtain a copy of
# the License at http://www.mozilla.org/MPL/
#
# Software distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" basis,
# WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. See the License
# for the specific language governing rights and limitations under the
# License.
#
# The Initial Developer of the Original Code is
#       Laurent Godard <listes.godard@laposte.net>
# Portions created by the Initial Developer are Copyright (C) 2010 the
# Initial Developer. All Rights Reserved.
#
# Major Contributor(s):
#       Timo <timo@iera.de>
#
# For minor contributions see the git repository.
#
# Alternatively, the contents of this file may be used under the terms of
# either the GNU General Public License Version 3 or later (the "GPLv3+"), or
# the GNU Lesser General Public License Version 3 or later (the "LGPLv3+"),
# in which case the provisions of the GPLv3+ or the LGPLv3+ are applicable
# instead of those above.

[rakeshbalusa]

@pombredanne
For the above issue there is some rule in scancode which is detecting The contents of this file are subject to the Mozilla Public License Version 1.1 as a license and ignoring the next two lines which is also license text. If I create a new rule with the entire text for MPL 1.1 given above then two rules will be detecting MPL 1.1 which I'm not sure is a good or bad practice. please let me know how to proceed.

[rakeshbalusa]

New rule fixed the issue 👍