Skip to content

Rename precise_license_detection field #2967 - #2968

Merged
JonoYang merged 2 commits into
developfrom
2967-rename-precise-license-detection
May 20, 2022
Merged

Rename precise_license_detection field #2967#2968
JonoYang merged 2 commits into
developfrom
2967-rename-precise-license-detection

Conversation

@JonoYang

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

This PR renames the field precise_license_detection from the license scoring plugin to identification_precision, which is the original intended name for the field.

    * Update expected test results

Signed-off-by: Jono Yang <jyang@nexb.com>

@AyanSinhaMahapatra AyanSinhaMahapatra left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks great!

But since we are changing the output format, we need to update it according to this https://scancode-toolkit.readthedocs.io/en/latest/misc/versioning.html btw, the format is here and add a changelog :P

@JonoYang

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@AyanSinhaMahapatra Thanks! I knew I was missing something

    * List the new fields of the summary plugin and license clarity plugins in the changelog

Signed-off-by: Jono Yang <jyang@nexb.com>
@JonoYang

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@AyanSinhaMahapatra @pombredanne

I've updated the changelog with a list of the the new fields that we are using to replace the old field with in the license clarity score and summarizer plugins. Should I also bump the json output version here as well, or are we going to do that when we finalize the 31.0.0 release?

@pombredanne pombredanne left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! Thanks!

@JonoYang
JonoYang merged commit a314fa3 into develop May 20, 2022
@JonoYang
JonoYang deleted the 2967-rename-precise-license-detection branch May 20, 2022 16:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants