Skip to content

Questionable accuracy of results for base debian slim image #128

Description

@cco3

I have concerns about some of these results on just the base debian-slim image.

For example, results for libstdc++6

 "license_expression": "agpl-3.0 AND amd-historical AND artistic-1.0 AND artistic-2.0 AND bsd-new AND bsd-no-disclaimer AND bsd-no-disclaimer-unmodified AND bsd-original AND bsd-original-uc AND bsd-original-uc-1986 AND bsd-simplified AND bsla AND d-zlib AND delorie-historical AND flex-2.5 AND gcc-exception-3.1 AND gfdl-1.2 AND gfdl-1.3-plus AND gpl-1.0-plus AND gpl-2.0 AND gpl-2.0 WITH gcc-linking-exception-2.0 AND gpl-2.0-plus AND gpl-3.0 AND gpl-3.0-plus AND gpl-3.0-plus WITH gcc-exception-3.1 AND hs-regexp AND intel-osl-1989 AND intel-osl-1993 AND lgpl-2.0 AND lgpl-2.0-plus AND lgpl-2.1 AND lgpl-2.1-plus AND lgpl-3.0-plus WITH cygwin-exception-lgpl-3.0-plus AND newlib-historical AND nilsson-historical AND osf-1990 AND other-copyleft AND other-permissive AND proprietary-license AND public-domain AND sunpro AND tex-exception AND unicode AND unknown AND unknown-license-reference AND uoi-ncsa AND viewflow-agpl-3.0-exception AND warranty-disclaimer AND wide-license AND x11 AND x11-hanson AND x11-lucent AND zlib AND zlib-acknowledgement"

(It's a txt file because I can't upload .json apparently)
Debian Slim.txt

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions