Skip to content

Support cleanup during unwinding #1677

Closed

Description

@bjorn3

Feature

Currently the generated unwinding information only restores registers. This issue proposes to make it possible to also run cleanup actions like running destructors during unwinding.

Benefit

This is necessary to support unwinding after a panic in rustc_codegen_cranelift.

Implementation

Add a new invoke terminator that is similar to the call instruction, but has an additional cleanup edge. This cleanup edge will be ignored when emitting actual machine instructions, but it will take part in the regalloc. Next add a way to mark a block as "landing pad". Only "landing pad" blocks can be used as cleanup edge of an invoke terminator. At the start of a "cleanup" block all values are stored either on stack or in any of the registers restored by the system unwinder. The "landing pad" block can also take several arguments. Those will be the values stored in the registers that are allowed for arguments to the landing pad received from the personality function. After codegen the location of every "landing pad" block will be stored in a variable. This will allow the embedder to generate the appropriate LSDA (language specific data area) to reference from the unwinding table.

Alternatives

It is basically impossible to implement cleanup during unwinding without Cranelift support.

References

The "Transferring Control to a Landing Pad" section of https://software.intel.com/sites/default/files/article/402129/mpx-linux64-abi.pdf

Activity

  1. bjorn3 commented on Jul 3, 2021

    @bjorn3
    ContributorAuthor

    Original pdf no longer exists. See https://itanium-cxx-abi.github.io/cxx-abi/abi-eh.html instead.

  2. bayedieng commented on Feb 26, 2023

    @bayedieng

    Could this issue be solved independently using the aforementioned solution in the OP's comment or would #3427 be needed to be resolved first?

  3. bjorn3 commented on Feb 26, 2023

    @bjorn3
    ContributorAuthor

    I'm working on this.

  4. overby-me commented on Jun 26, 2024

    @overby-me

    @bjorn3 Any PR or branch where it is possible to follow progress?

  5. bjorn3 commented on Jun 26, 2024

    @bjorn3
    ContributorAuthor

    https://github.com/bjorn3/wasmtime/tree/bsc-unwinding-simple-invoke3 is the latest version I have. I will rebase it and work on upstreaming when I finish my thesis about it.

  6. cfallin commented on Apr 23, 2025

    @cfallin
    Member

    Cleaning up old issues and I believe this is covered now by the exceptions support we landed recently (#10510). Thanks all (and thanks bjorn3 for the experimental work that helped us develop our current design).

  7. whitequark commented on Apr 24, 2025

    @whitequark
    Contributor

    Oh, does wasmtime support exceptions now? This is incredibly exciting, is there anything I can read on that?

  8. bjorn3 commented on Apr 24, 2025

    @bjorn3
    ContributorAuthor

    This isn't implemented on the Wasmtime side yet.

    Edit: #2049, #3427 and #10252 are still open.

  9. cfallin commented on Apr 24, 2025

    @cfallin
    Member

    Right, this issue was specifically about Cranelift exceptions, @whitequark -- I will hopefully get time to do the Wasmtime side soon (next few months-ish)...

  10. fitzgen commented on Apr 24, 2025

    @fitzgen
    Member

    And if you'd like to learn more, here is the RFC: bytecodealliance/rfcs#36

  11. whitequark commented on Apr 24, 2025

    @whitequark
    Contributor

    Thanks all!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions