Skip to content

Travis build suspended?  #271

Closed
Closed

Description

@speedytwenty

The tests are presently failing and there is no indication of this with this in build-status badge. The last build was 6 months ago and there is no build for commits to master since then.

https://app.travis-ci.com/github/cli-table/cli-table3/branches

While I'm logged into TravisCI, it says:

Builds have been temporarily disabled for public repositories due to a negative credit balance. Please go to the [Plan page](https://app.travis-ci.com/organizations/cli-table/plan) to replenish your credit balance or alter your [Consume paid credits for OSS setting](https://app.travis-ci.com/organizations/cli-table/plan?anchor=oss-consumption).

Not sure who specifically has access to see what's going on with Travis, but it will be ideal to get this resolved so that it is apparent when the build fails (as it would presently).

Activity

  1. DanielRuf commented on Mar 24, 2022

    @DanielRuf
    Contributor

    I would say we should move to GHA (GitHub Actions) since Travis CI had some security issues in the past and the OSS plans were trimmed down after an investor bought them.

  2. DanielRuf commented on Mar 24, 2022

    @DanielRuf
    Contributor

    Relevant news with the new OSS (10k) credit: https://blog.travis-ci.com/2020-11-02-travis-ci-new-billing

  3. speedytwenty commented on Mar 24, 2022

    @speedytwenty
    CollaboratorAuthor

    I don't really have a preference beyond the desire of being prevented from accidentally releasing a failing build.

    It looks like Travis was configured to build on Node 10, 12, and 13. I suppose it would be ideal to reestablish that by whatever means may be best—and least likely to be impeded by outages/suspensions in the future. Not too familiar with GHA and not familiar with the options available for running the builds. I can poke around but if anyone knows of a current example that'd be helpful!

    Additionally, it might be worth considering a pre-commit hook that runs eslint and the tests to help ensure contributors are submitting tested code. While I don't prefer the added dependency [for dev], something like Husky would promote tested code without the dependency of a 3rd-party service.

  4. speedytwenty commented on Mar 24, 2022

    @speedytwenty
    CollaboratorAuthor

    I've got an attempt of GHA in progress here: speedytwenty#8

    I'll get a PR in here once I've got it sufficiently working.

  5. linked a pull request that will close this issueMove CI to Github Actions #276on Mar 24, 2022
  6. speedytwenty commented on Mar 27, 2022

    @speedytwenty
    CollaboratorAuthor

    Going to go ahead and merge this as I have a few other PRs in and more on the way.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    bugSomething isn't working

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions