Repository navigation
ci: run script/mcpx-cleanup.test.ts in the unit job - #139
Conversation
script/ is not a workspace, so bun turbo test never executed the mcpx-cleanup tests, and the root bunfig test root deliberately blocks running tests from the repo root. Add a unit-job step that runs the file explicitly from script/ on both OS legs. Verified: 14 pass / 0 fail locally via the step's exact command; a deliberate breakage of a pinned expectation makes it fail.
Codex Review SummaryThis comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings. |
|
You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard. |
|
This PR doesn't fully meet our contributing guidelines and PR template. What needs to be fixed:
Please edit this PR description to address the above within 72 hours, or it will be automatically closed. If you believe this was flagged incorrectly, please let a maintainer know. |
|
Hey! Your PR title Please update it to start with one of:
Where See CONTRIBUTING.md for details. |
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info
📝 Walkthrough
Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to
|
|
The following comment was made by an LLM, it may be inaccurate: |
Fixes #138
script/mcpx-cleanup.test.ts(14 tests / 29 assertions for the mcpx leaked-daemon cleanup script) was run by nothing:script/is not a workspace sobun turbo testskips it, and the rootbunfig.tomltest root deliberately blocks running tests from the repo root.This adds one step to the existing unit job in
test.ymlthat runs the file explicitly withworking-directory: script, on both OS legs. The root-level test block stays intact.Verified locally with the step's exact command:
processDiscovery("linux")) makes the run fail (1 fail); reverted, green again.Need help on this PR? Tag
@codesmith-botwith what you need.Summary by CodeRabbit