You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
Rename InboundFilters integration to EventFilters #15431
If we get a chance to change this, I propose to rename the inboundFiltersIntegration because its name doesn't make a lot of sense. Open for other suggestions but logically, outboundFiltersIntegration makes way more sense.
After a bit of reflection, I think outboundFilters only makes sense if you knew the previous name, so I propose something like EventFilters for a fresh perspective :)
Reasons why I think "InboundFilters" is a confusing name:
Nothing is "inbound" in the SDK world in the sense that we would filter incoming events. On the contrary, this integration filters out outbound events the SDK would send to Sentry.
We have a product feature called "Inbound Filters" which users sometimes confuse or mix up with the SDK integration.
The integration name does not reflect the purpose well. Granted, eventFilters isn't perfect either but at least it suggests that events (errors and transactions) get filtered out by this integration.
This integration is likely used a lot so we should probably leave it deprecated for a major or two before we actually remove it.
changed the title [-]Rename `InboundFilters` integration to `OutboundFilters`[/-][+]Rename `InboundFilters` integration to `EventFilters`[/+]on Feb 17, 2025
Activity
[-]Rename `InboundFilters` integration to `OutboundFilters`[/-][+]Rename `InboundFilters` integration to `EventFilters`[/+]Lms24 commentedon Mar 3, 2025
Renaming was done via #15434, including the deprecation of
inboundFiltersIntegration.Leaving this issue open and in the v10 milestone to remove the export with the old name.
feat(core)!: Remove deprecated `inboundFiltersIntegration` (#23008)
github-actions commentedon Sep 23, 2026
A PR closing this issue has just been released 🚀
This issue was referenced by PR #23008, which was included in the 11.0.0 release.