Skip to content

Would you consider a pull-request adding support for Peewee ORM? #289

Closed

Description

@coleifer

Hi, my name is Charles Leifer. I'm the author of Peewee, a lightweight Python ORM. It's been steadily growing in popularity in the last couple years and has over 3000 stars and 500+ forks. graphene is an impressive library and I am grateful to you for taking the time to write it and open-source it. I think it'd be great for the users of Peewee to be able to use your library, and if you did not want to write the bindings I would be happy to contribute some in a pull-request.

What do you think?

Activity

  1. syrusakbary commented on Sep 15, 2016

    @syrusakbary
    Member

    Hi Charles,

    I'm absolutely open for having an integration between Peewee and Graphene, I think it will be super valuable for the developers!

    Starting with the next version 1.0, Graphene integrations will be separated from the main codebase into external repos within the graphql-python community. (This is already happening for the Graphene Google App Engine integration)

    Each of the repos will be maintained by different people that are specialized in the framework that are integrating with (I can't think of someone better than you for the graphene-peewee integration! 😉 )

    We can follow the same process we did for graphene-gae: You can start a graphene-peewee repo in your profile and once is mature (tested and with a working example) we can move it into the graphql-python community :)

    Or we can start directly creating a graphene-peewee repo in the graphql-python community and you will be the admin of this repo.

    Just let me know what you prefer! :)

  2. coleifer commented on Sep 17, 2016

    @coleifer
    Author

    I'll take it on as a personal repo, and we can take it from there. Thanks for your encouragement and your interest!

  3. syrusakbary commented on Sep 17, 2016

    @syrusakbary
    Member

    Great! :)
    PS: I just added you the perms for maintain the graphene-peewee package in PyPI (if you want to use it!)

  4. ParthGandhi commented on Sep 19, 2016

    @ParthGandhi

    @coleifer Awesome, look forward to it. I'd love to help if you need any.

  5. joshdavey commented on Oct 19, 2016

    @joshdavey

    Hey guys, thanks so much for these two amazing libraries. Can't wait for them to work together officially. Is there anywhere I can follow the progress of graphene-peewee?

    Thanks

  6. danigosa commented on Dec 31, 2016

    @danigosa

    @coleifer we need to decide in our organization if we go for SQLAlchemy or Peewee (coming from Django ORM in older projects), could you open the work in progress so we can check how is it doing and possibly contribute to make it possible? Most devs in my team we prefer Peewee (congrats and thanx!) but GraphQL is one elevated requirement for the stack we are building.

  7. coleifer commented on Jan 3, 2017

    @coleifer
    Author

    Hey @danigosa -- between work and moving our house I don't believe I'll be able to work on this for at least a couple weeks. I hope you understand.

  8. danigosa commented on Jan 5, 2017

    @danigosa

    Don't even worry, we are facing other architecture layers? Anyway we are using peewee-async finally so no matter what in the times to come if you start this we'll contribute, for now we are not going to far in the frontend side to use graphql at its best so... Good luck with the move :)

  9. axsaucedo commented on Feb 28, 2017

    @axsaucedo

    Thank you very much for this contribution @coleifer! @danigosa I would definitely recommend Peewee, especially if you come from the Django ORM world

  10. jontonsoup commented on Apr 7, 2017

    @jontonsoup

    Is there a place where I can follow this? @coleifer

  11. Hendler commented on Apr 28, 2017

    @Hendler

    Excited! Can we help out? Is there a place we can follow @coleifer ?

  12. clayrisser commented on Jun 26, 2017

    @clayrisser

    What's the status of this? Are there any existing ways to use peewee with graphql?

  13. alexpantyukhin commented on Nov 22, 2017

    @alexpantyukhin

    It's interesting for me @coleifer @syrusakbary @danigosa . I can try to implement if it's not done yet and nobody already works with it..

  14. slash-oleh commented on Nov 27, 2017

    @slash-oleh

    If someone is interested I've done some implementation for peewee-async package here. It should not be much different from graphene-django integration which I mostly relied on at the design stage. Initially I was doing that for my own needs, but now I am trying to provide generic maintaining. So if someone will make use of it or want to contribute, I would be glad to help.

  15. tsingh-wavefin commented on May 10, 2020

    @tsingh-wavefin

    I ported @insolite’s graphene-peewee-async to the regular Peewee. Check it out here:

    graphene-peewee

    This is my first major OSS contribution, so please leave feedback if anything can be improved. Also, this is an early release with limited testing. It has not been used in production by me. There may well be bugs.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions