Skip to content

Handle relative layout with a view with a transforms and/or a modified anchorPoint - #116

Merged
lucdion merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
handle_relative_position_with_anchorpoint_and_transforms
Jan 20, 2018
Merged

lucdion merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
handle_relative_position_with_anchorpoint_and_transforms

Conversation

@lucdion

@lucdion lucdion commented Jan 19, 2018

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Handle correctly situations where a view is layouted relative to a view with a transforms and/or a modified anchorPoint.

…ew with a transforms and/or a modified anchorPoint.

@hugolefrancois hugolefrancois left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

@codecov-io

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Merging #116 into master will increase coverage by 0.07%.
The diff coverage is 100%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##           master    #116      +/-   ##
=========================================
+ Coverage   91.02%   91.1%   +0.07%     
=========================================
  Files          35      35              
  Lines        6796    6854      +58     
=========================================
+ Hits         6186    6244      +58     
  Misses        610     610
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
Tests/TransformSpec.swift 100% <100%> (ø) ⬆️
Sources/Impl/Coordinates.swift 100% <100%> (ø) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 89986ba...e2db7a6. Read the comment docs.

@lucdion
lucdion merged commit 99ab4ee into master Jan 20, 2018
@lucdion
lucdion deleted the handle_relative_position_with_anchorpoint_and_transforms branch January 20, 2018 18:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants