Skip to content

Experiment with read retries to handle BufferUnderflowExceptions. - #132

Merged
vpipkt merged 2 commits into
locationtech:developfrom
s22s:feature/fix/rf-131
Jun 6, 2019
Merged

vpipkt merged 2 commits into
locationtech:developfrom
s22s:feature/fix/rf-131

Conversation

@metasim

@metasim metasim commented Jun 3, 2019

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

To address #131

@metasim

metasim commented Jun 5, 2019

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

According to @courtney-whalen large model training completed after this change.

@metasim
metasim requested a review from vpipkt June 5, 2019 14:20
@courtney-layman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Yeah, tested it out several times and haven't gotten a BufferUnderflowException again

@locationtech locationtech deleted a comment from courtney-layman Jun 5, 2019
// result
// }


Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry about that comment block. Will get rid of eventually.

_delRef = newDel
result
}
}

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is the tricky bit. Need to make sure it's thread safe, even though multiple threads "shouldn't" be calling the read code.

@vpipkt
vpipkt merged commit bcd4943 into locationtech:develop Jun 6, 2019
@pomadchin

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@metasim did it finally work?

@metasim
metasim deleted the feature/fix/rf-131 branch June 6, 2019 16:22
@metasim

metasim commented Jun 6, 2019

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@pomadchin Not sure yet.... takes a larger deployment process and several hours of training to be absolutely sure.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants