Repository navigation
CP-Unterbrechung: ausstehende Phasenumschaltung ohne Umschalt-Hardware blockiert evtl - #4219
Open
seaspotter wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
seaspotter wants to merge 1 commit into
seaspotter wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
LKuemmel
approved these changes
Oct 30, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Folgefix zu #4014 (#4215, Discussion #4203).
Ohne Umschalt-Hardware kann die Phasenzahl beim Ladestart kurz vom Ziel abweichen, wodurch
_is_phase_switch_required()genau in diesem einen ZyklusTrueliefert und die CP-Unterbrechung dauerhaft blockiert bleibt - gleiches Symptom wie in #3908, nur über einen anderen Pfad.Fix: die Bedingung greift nur noch, wenn Umschalt-Hardware vorhanden ist.
Test angepasst und einen neuen für den Fall ohne Hardware ergänzt.
Noch nicht an einem Log mit dem genauen Ladestart-Zeitpunkt bestätigt.