You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
Adding new defs to the LexicalIndex.xml and extending Strong's numbers? #94
A "vanilla" Strong's number looks something like H430. But OSHB features "extended" Strong's numbers (eg. 6635 b), which (as far as I can tell) account for multiple meanings of the same word, and seem related to the aug field in the (really cool) LexicalIndex.xml. (OSHB also has "extended-extended" Strong's numbers, which look like c/d/5531 b, where the actual Strong's number is 5531, and the the first part c/d/ seems to only account for extra words within a word (eg. prepositions/articles/conjunctions like "in", "the", "and"), and the latter part b is as before).
Where was this extension to Strong's numbers devised, and, more importantly, can it be extended within the OSHB project?
Eg. consider H430. The LexicalIndex.xmldef says gods.
Notice that I've also added a corresponding aug field to each <entry>.
Can this be done? Does it make sense?
Of course this would require going to every instance of H430 and adding an a or a b postfix (or c, d, etc.), depending on the meaning (and people sometimes disagree in certain verses, like Psa 50.1).
But maybe what I want to do is done / can be done in another way, and I'm just speaking nonsense. Or maybe I've understood nothing about the extended Strong's numbers.
I'm also curious, where does the def field some from?
changed the title [-]Adding new `def`s to the LexicalIndex.xml and extending Strong's numbers?[/-][+]Adding new `def`s to the `LexicalIndex.xml` and extending Strong's numbers?[/+]on Jun 22, 2022
The Lexical Index is meant to be an index to the entries in Strong's, as
well as Brown, Driver, Briggs and the codes for the Theological Wordbook
of the Old Testament. The def element was added just to give w rough
ides of what word is being referenced. This is all described in
HebrewLexicon.pdf, as well as the readme.md for the lexicon.
On 6/22/2022 5:12 AM, Diego Alonso wrote:
A "vanilla" Strong's number looks something like H430
<https://studybible.info/strongs/h6635>. But OSHB features "extended"
Strong's numbers (eg. |6635 b|), which (as far as I can tell) account
for multiple meanings of the same word, and seem related to the |aug|
field in the (really cool) |LexicalIndex.xml|
<https://github.com/openscriptures/HebrewLexicon/blob/master/LexicalIndex.xml>.
(OSHB also has "extended-extended" Strong's numbers, which look like
|c/d/5531 b|, where the actual Strong's number is |5531|, and the the
first part |c/d/| seems to only account for extra words within a word
(eg. prepositions/articles/conjunctions like "in", "the", "and"), and
the latter part |b| is as before).
Where was this extension to Strong's numbers devised, and, more
importantly, can it be extended within the OSHB project?
Eg. consider |H430| <https://studybible.info/strongs/h430>. The
|LexicalIndex.xml| |def| says |gods|.
<entry id="arn">
<w xlit="ʾĕlōhîm">אֱלֹהִים</w> <pos>N</pos> <def>gods</def>
<xref bdb="a.dl.ad" strong="430" twot="93c"/>
<etym type="sub">arm</etym>
</entry>
But what if I'd like to add another |<entry>| to the |xml|, to account
for the meaning |God|?
Eg.
<entry id="arn">
<w xlit="ʾĕlōhîm">אֱלֹהִים</w> <pos>N</pos> <def>God</def>
<xref bdb="a.dl.ad" strong="430" aug="a" twot="93c"/>
<etym type="sub">arm</etym>
</entry>
<entry id="arn">
<w xlit="ʾĕlōhîm">אֱלֹהִים</w> <pos>N</pos> <def>gods</def>
<xref bdb="a.dl.ad" strong="430" aug="b" twot="93c"/>
<etym type="sub">arm</etym>
</entry>
Notice that I've also added a corresponding |aug| field to each |<entry>|.
Can this be done? Does it make sense?
Of course this would require going to every instance of |H430| and
adding an |a| or a |b| postfix (or |c|, |d|, etc.), depending on the
meaning (and people sometimes disagree in certain verses, like Psa
50.1 <https://biblegateway.com/passage/?search=psa+50.1&version=GNV>).
(Although you can automate the process if you have, say, a KJV with
embedded Strong's numbers.)
But maybe what I want to do is done / can be done in another way, and
I'm just speaking nonsense. Or maybe I've understood nothing about the
extended Strong's numbers.
I'm also curious, where does the |def| field some from?
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#94>, or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AABLABIVR65A75GUUH63HP3VQLKH7ANCNFSM5ZPO6WXQ>.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this
thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>
Activity
[-]Adding new `def`s to the LexicalIndex.xml and extending Strong's numbers?[/-][+]Adding new `def`s to the `LexicalIndex.xml` and extending Strong's numbers?[/+]DavidTroidl commentedon Jun 22, 2022
etale-cohomology commentedon Jun 23, 2022
Okay thank you!