Skip to content

Release 0.630 planning #5537

Activity

  1. self-assigned this
    on Aug 29, 2018
  2. ilevkivskyi commented on Aug 29, 2018

    @ilevkivskyi
    MemberAuthor

    I think these two should be fixed before the release: #5534 and #2128

  3. emmatyping commented on Aug 29, 2018

    @emmatyping
    Member

    I would like to get #5517 in, as it makes finding typeshed a lot simpler and more robust.

  4. Michael0x2a commented on Aug 29, 2018

    @Michael0x2a
    Collaborator

    I was just about to mention #2128, actually -- I'm currently in the process of writing some code to resolve that issue and hope to submit a PR either later today or sometime tomorrow.

  5. srittau commented on Aug 29, 2018

    @srittau
    Contributor

    Is there any chance to have #4913 fixed in the release? Guido's comment seems to indicate it is an easy fix, although I can't judge this.

  6. gvanrossum commented on Aug 29, 2018

    @gvanrossum
    Member

    Maybe #4567? It's a plugin hook for MRO calculation that some user would like to see. I think it's unobjectionable, though it currently has a non-trivial conflict (you edited the same code in your most recent fix or MRO-related issues).

  7. ilevkivskyi commented on Aug 29, 2018

    @ilevkivskyi
    MemberAuthor

    I think it also makes sense to fix #5514

  8. JelleZijlstra commented on Aug 30, 2018

    @JelleZijlstra
    Member

    In general, it would be good to sync typeshed right before creating the branch, so that people's typeshed fixes make it in. Maybe that could be part of the standard release procedure.

  9. ilevkivskyi commented on Aug 30, 2018

    @ilevkivskyi
    MemberAuthor

    Maybe that could be part of the standard release procedure.

    This is in our internal team playbook. I will make a sync on Monday probably.

  10. gvanrossum commented on Sep 1, 2018

    @gvanrossum
    Member

    A regression: #5557.

  11. Michael0x2a commented on Sep 4, 2018

    @Michael0x2a
    Collaborator

    This is cutting it close to the deadline (sorry!), but it'd be nice if #5571 could also be merged in. (It partially addresses some of the feedback regarding error messages in #5557).

  12. ilevkivskyi commented on Sep 5, 2018

    @ilevkivskyi
    MemberAuthor

    #5573 should be fixed before the release.

  13. gvanrossum commented on Sep 5, 2018

    @gvanrossum
    Member

    I suspect #5576 may be worth fixing?

    At this point we should probably consider postponing the release by a few business days.

    I'd also like to see a consolidated list of all issues and PRs that are blocking the release.

  14. ilevkivskyi commented on Sep 5, 2018

    @ilevkivskyi
    MemberAuthor

    I'd also like to see a consolidated list of all issues and PRs that are blocking the release.

    I updated the description with a list.

    I suspect #5576 may be worth fixing?

    Why is this important? This release is already late, I would limit ourselves to only critical things.

    At this point we should probably consider postponing the release by a few business days.

    Yes, I think we can do it on Monday-Tuesday. However, if there are no additional things I would cut release branch tomorrow.

  15. gvanrossum commented on Sep 5, 2018

    @gvanrossum
    Member

    OK, I see #5576 is not that important -- it's not a regression AFAICT.

  16. gvanrossum commented on Sep 5, 2018

    @gvanrossum
    Member

    Then it looks like there are no blockers left. Can you cut the branch tonight?

  17. ilevkivskyi commented on Sep 5, 2018

    @ilevkivskyi
    MemberAuthor

    Then it looks like there are no blockers left. Can you cut the branch tonight?

    Hm, indeed. OK, I will do this now.

  18. ilevkivskyi commented on Sep 5, 2018

    @ilevkivskyi
    MemberAuthor

    OK, release branch is cut.

  19. ilevkivskyi commented on Sep 10, 2018

    @ilevkivskyi
    MemberAuthor

    After some thinking we decided that we should first fix #5514 and postpone the release by few days again -- new target date is Friday, September 14.

    (I updated the issue description.)

  20. srittau commented on Sep 13, 2018

    @srittau
    Contributor

    Please have a look at python/typeshed#2456 as well. (Although I am not sure whether the changes causing this are in the release branch.)

  21. ilevkivskyi commented on Sep 13, 2018

    @ilevkivskyi
    MemberAuthor

    @srittau The PR that caused this didn't get into the release branch, but we anyway decided to revert it.

  22. Michael0x2a commented on Sep 16, 2018

    @Michael0x2a
    Collaborator

    I'm not sure if we've started the release process yet or not, but if there's still time, could we perhaps sneak in #5595? It's almost entirely a docs change -- the only actual change in the code is a small tweak to the text we print out when running mypy --help.

    If this is too late/too much trouble, that's totally fine -- this is a pretty low-priority thing. I'm bringing this up mostly because I think it would be a little cleaner if we could include all of the command line/config file stuff in one release instead of across two. (So this PR would be released along with #5333 and #5334.)

  23. ilevkivskyi commented on Sep 16, 2018

    @ilevkivskyi
    MemberAuthor

    We are kind of deep into the release process, in the sense that everything is ready, but the actual release was already postponed twice for some reasons. If everything will be OK, I will upload packages to PyPI on Monday morning. There is no big need for doc updates, since the website is anyway built from master. I mean you can already see your changes on https://mypy.readthedocs.io.

  24. Michael0x2a commented on Sep 16, 2018

    @Michael0x2a
    Collaborator

    Only if you visit https://mypy.readthedocs.io/en/latest/ -- if you visit https://mypy.readthedocs.io/en/stable/ (which is what mypy-lang.org links to), you won't see the changes.

    But anyways, no worries -- I figured I might as well try asking.

  25. ilevkivskyi commented on Sep 17, 2018

    @ilevkivskyi
    MemberAuthor

    The release is out!

  26. gvanrossum commented on Sep 17, 2018

    @gvanrossum
    Member
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions