Skip to content

geotiff: reader kwarg order drift across open_geotiff/read_geotiff_gpu/read_geotiff_dask/read_vrt #1935

Closed

Description

@brendancol

The four public reader entry points expose name, chunks, window, overview_level in different orders. The kwargs are keyword-only so positional callers never broke, but inspect.signature, IDE autocomplete, and the Sphinx-rendered docs all show drift.

Current order after source (keyword-only):

function order
open_geotiff dtype, window, overview_level, band, name, chunks, gpu, max_pixels, on_gpu_failure, missing_sources
read_geotiff_gpu dtype, overview_level, window, band, name, chunks, max_pixels, on_gpu_failure, gpu
read_geotiff_dask dtype, chunks, overview_level, window, band, max_pixels, name
read_vrt dtype, window, band, name, chunks, gpu, max_pixels, missing_sources

read_vrt already matches open_geotiff (modulo params it does not accept). read_geotiff_gpu has overview_level and window swapped. read_geotiff_dask has chunks and name out of order.

This mirrors the writer-side fix in #1922 / #1925: pick the canonical order (open_geotiff) and reorder the outliers. Add a regression test that pins the keyword-only parameter order for all four readers via inspect.signature.

Scope:

  • xrspatial/geotiff/_backends/gpu.py: read_geotiff_gpu
  • xrspatial/geotiff/_backends/dask.py: read_geotiff_dask
  • xrspatial/geotiff/_backends/vrt.py: read_vrt (already conforms; covered by the regression test)
  • New test under xrspatial/geotiff/tests/
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions