You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
GH-47277: [R] Disable building OpenSSL 1.X binaries - #47281
Cheers @kou for pointing me towards the macros! I'm keeping the scope of this PR fairly minimal just to get the nightlies building again ASAP, and following up on the rest of the removal in #47280.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Rationale for this change
Nightlies failing to build with openSSL < 3.0
What changes are included in this PR?
Ditch those builds while we figure out if we need to drop support or not in the more complex #47280
Are these changes tested?
No but I'll check if things build
Are there any user-facing changes?
Yup, no nightly binaries if you've got openSSL < 3 but they've not been built since mid-July anyway, so not really