Skip to content

ci(mcpx): first measured iteration — static e2e shards + unit + lint + ci-ok (#1998) - #2888

Merged
dezren39 merged 6 commits into
mainfrom
queue/3294-1998-mcpx-ci-shards
Nov 2, 2026
Merged

dezren39 merged 6 commits into
mainfrom
queue/3294-1998-mcpx-ci-shards

Conversation

@dezren39

@dezren39 dezren39 commented Oct 31, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Implements the first measured CI iteration for #1998 (queue task 3294), reconciled against the three live workflows rather than the deleted serial mcpx.yml.

What

Verification

Closes part of #1998 (baseline table follow-up stays on the issue).


View with [code]smith Autofix with [code]smith
Need help on this PR? Tag @codesmith-bot with what you need.

@dezren39
dezren39 requested a review from a team as a code owner October 31, 2026 00:49
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Oct 31, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Review in Change Stack →

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

  • Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

Share

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Oct 31, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-11-02T14:40:58.094355Z cb94014 New commits
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: c4274f76fa

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread .github/workflows/mcpx-test.yml Resolved
Comment thread .github/workflows/mcpx-test.yml Resolved
Comment thread .github/workflows/mcpx-test.yml Resolved
…retained-results fallback, run-created queue metric (#1998)
@dezren39

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@codex review — 87adcfc fixes all 3 P2s from the previous round (ready_for_review trigger; ci-ok retained-results fallback for ci-ok-only re-run attempts; queue metrics from run created_at, labeled run-to-start). Each thread replied to and resolved. Please re-review the new head.

CI disposition for run 41152763644 (head 52d9466), recorded by lane C / task 3294:

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 87adcfc25f

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread .github/workflows/mcpx-test.yml Resolved
claude and others added 2 commits October 30, 2026 23:05
The ci-ok job's always() does not override a step's default success()
condition, so the aggregation gate's exit 1 skipped the #140
measurement step on exactly the red runs whose timings the baseline
needs. Step-level always() keeps the failing job conclusion and the
failing gate while still printing and recording the table.
@dezren39

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

🤖 Agent note · parked (CI red — precise failing stage)

@dezren39

dezren39 commented Nov 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Merge pass 2026-11-01: holding this PR. It is mergeable, but the mcpx-test workflow it introduces fails on this branch (unit FAILURE, e2e shards 0-5 FAILURE, ci-ok FAILURE; init + lint SUCCESS) — landing it would put red CI on main. Resolution task: #3813 — fix the failures on the branch, or record them as the intended #1998 baseline and adjust the ci-ok gating, then merge.

@dezren39

dezren39 commented Nov 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

🤖 Agent note · check-in

@dezren39

dezren39 commented Nov 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

🤖 Agent note · escalated

@dezren39
dezren39 merged commit 34c791f into main Nov 2, 2026
0 of 3 checks passed
@dezren39
dezren39 deleted the queue/3294-1998-mcpx-ci-shards branch November 2, 2026 14:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants