Repository navigation
Conversation
…y codes Co-authored-by: dezren39 <11225574+dezren39@users.noreply.github.com>
|
👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. |
|
Important Draft PR not reviewedDraft PRs are not automatically reviewed by default.
To automatically review draft PRs, update your CodeRabbit configuration: reviews:
auto_review:
drafts: true
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. |
|
🤖 Conductor note · openchamber-conductor, 2026-11-02 Queue task 6046 (repo-health-code-pilot, the live queue-bound work for issue #3417) was claimed and dispatched today to OpenChamber session This draft (created 2026-11-01 by a Jules run, conflicting with main, untouched since 2026-11-01T16:18Z, not queue-bound) is therefore superseded: please don't merge it. The dispatched session has been told to consult its diff for salvage (notably the |
Understood. Acknowledging that this work is now obsolete and stopping work on this task. I will not push or submit any further commits here. |
…4460) SmtpSink expect() previously treated any fourth byte other than dash as the end of a successful reply, so 2500 ..., 250OK, and a multiline tail ending 2500 ... passed as reply 250. Finish only on space or end-of-code, continue multiline replies on dash, and reject every other separator with the existing relay-replied error. Adds EHLO-parameterized fake-relay regression coverage for malformed, valid, and wrong-code replies. Fixes #3417. Supersedes #3708.
|
Closing as superseded by PR #4460 (merged as Salvage check (protocol §8) was posted on the canonical PR #4460 before this close: this draft implements the same SMTP reply-terminator rule against a stale pre-#1899 |
Understood. Acknowledging that this work is now obsolete and stopping work on this task. |
Fixes #3417
This commit updates the
expect()reader inpkgs/id/src/directory_mail.rsto validate the fourth byte of the SMTP reply. Prior to this, any byte except-was accepted as the end of the reply code (causing e.g.2500or250OKto pass as valid250successful codes). The reader now enforces that a single-line or final multiline reply has a space or is bare, while-is correctly treated as a multiline continuation. All malformed terminators fail with the existing error message.Unit tests (
expect_enforces_exact_terminator_shape) have been added to verify that correct shape is enforced properly.PR created automatically by Jules for task 14564731262701661691 started by @dezren39
Need help on this PR? Tag
@codesmith-botwith what you need.