Skip to content

feat(id): package tic-tac-toe as the first apps/ folder + host discovery (#2324) - #3926

Merged
dezren39 merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
queue/5769-2324-tic-tac-toe-app
Nov 1, 2026
Merged

dezren39 merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
queue/5769-2324-tic-tac-toe-app

Conversation

@dezren39

@dezren39 dezren39 commented Nov 1, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Implements #2324 (queue task 5769), Phase 1 of the #2028 ID core v1 synthesis: proves the #2026 app-packaging design against the smallest real example.

What changed

  • pkgs/id/examples/tic-tac-toe/ moved (not copied) to pkgs/id/apps/tic-tac-toe/: program/ (main.roc, tic-tac-toe.wasm, build.sh), README, and a new app.toml per the id: investigate: app packaging — apps as folders (code + resources), TUI/web interface parity, web-native specialization #2026 schema ([app], [program] kind = "roc-world", [interfaces.web] mode = "adapter").
  • New pkgs/id/src/app_manifest.rs: strict manifest types (deny_unknown_fields throughout) + host-side discovery that enumerates apps/ folders, parses app.toml, and rejects unknown fields and folder-name != app id mismatches (design invariants). Registered in lib.rs; serve/sandbox/world_fixture consume the packaged layout.
  • Tests/fixtures updated for the new paths: cli_integration.rs, attestation_poc.rs, flake.nix, nix/tests/integration-test.nix, roc-world README. New app_manifest tests cover discovery plus malformed-manifest rejection (unknown field, id/folder mismatch).

Out of scope (per packet)

Verification

This branch was implemented by a prior queue lane and committed/pushed by lane F on resume, per the fleet resume-don't-restart rule.


View with [code]smith Autofix with [code]smith
Need help on this PR? Tag @codesmith-bot with what you need.

@dezren39
dezren39 requested a review from a team as a code owner November 1, 2026 18:47
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Nov 1, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

You've used all free OSS reviews for now. Wait for the free limit to reset to keep reviewing this public repository.

Next included review available in 39 minutes.

Check out review usage here.

View limit details

Limit details: You’ve used the included review currently available.

Learn how review limits work.

Review configuration:

Run configuration
  • Source mode: Auto
  • Repository: Unavailable
  • Branch: Unavailable
  • File: No configuration file from this repository applied
  • Commit: Unavailable
  • Layers: defaults
  • Review profile: CHILL
  • Plan: Advanced
  • Run ID: 2d44737b-54bc-4257-b77e-8a98c9e7e6d6
Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0fedbfc and 5ec2fb9.

Files ignored due to path filters: 1
  • pkgs/id/apps/tic-tac-toe/program/tic-tac-toe.wasm is excluded by !**/*.wasm
Files selected for processing: 14
  • pkgs/id/apps/tic-tac-toe/README.md
  • pkgs/id/apps/tic-tac-toe/app.toml
  • pkgs/id/apps/tic-tac-toe/program/build.sh
  • pkgs/id/apps/tic-tac-toe/program/main.roc
  • pkgs/id/examples/roc-world/README.md
  • pkgs/id/flake.nix
  • pkgs/id/nix/tests/integration-test.nix
  • pkgs/id/src/app_manifest.rs
  • pkgs/id/src/commands/serve.rs
  • pkgs/id/src/lib.rs
  • pkgs/id/src/sandbox.rs
  • pkgs/id/src/world_fixture.rs
  • pkgs/id/tests/attestation_poc.rs
  • pkgs/id/tests/cli_integration.rs
  • Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

Share

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Nov 1, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-11-01T21:30:23.530049Z 5ec2fb9 Manual request
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 2c5973eec2

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

@dezren39

dezren39 commented Nov 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@codex review

Fix round 5ec2fb9 pushed for the P2 on 2c5973e (platform path in the relocated tic-tac-toe app; thread replied + resolved). Note: the id-core vt100 test-compile errors are pre-existing on main and outside this PR's paths.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. 👍

Reviewed commit: 5ec2fb9339

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

@dezren39
dezren39 merged commit df3f836 into main Nov 1, 2026
1 check passed
@dezren39
dezren39 deleted the queue/5769-2324-tic-tac-toe-app branch November 1, 2026 23:01
dezren39 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 2, 2026
df3f836 (#3926) moved the tic-tac-toe example from
examples/tic-tac-toe/ to apps/tic-tac-toe/program/ and updated
the include_bytes! sites in src/sandbox.rs, but missed the
compile-time fixture in tests/worker_poc_reference.rs — which
breaks the id test build at main HEAD (found by the #3720 fold
switch's toplevel build) — and the same stale path in the
worker-poc compare runner. Both now reference
apps/tic-tac-toe/program/tic-tac-toe.wasm, which exists.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant