Skip to content

Phase 3b (#3456): plain-output contract statement + terminal_text strips Cf - #4458

Merged
dezren39 merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
queue/5380-3456-is-control-audit
Nov 2, 2026
Merged

dezren39 merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
queue/5380-3456-is-control-audit

Conversation

@dezren39

@dezren39 dezren39 commented Nov 2, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Closes the code-change half of #3456 (design #3455 Phase 3b audit). The inventory table and closing evidence are posted as comments on #3456 / #3455; this PR carries the doc change plus the one site dispositioned as needing a fix on this branch.

Changes

  • pkgs/id/src/commands/text.rs module doc: the plain-output contract statement — two character classes (structure Cc + U+2028/U+2029; format Cf), disposition-by-surface-kind rule (row renderers escape / stripping sanitizers strip / ingest validators refuse), shared Cf home (crate::is_format_char in id-core/src/unicode.rs) + Unicode version (16).
  • pkgs/id/src/world_ssh.rs terminal_text: strip the shared Cf set in addition to Cc (was Cc-only, keep LF/TAB). Terminal output is the contract's core threat surface — one participant's text must not reorder another's terminal. Documented cost: ZWJ-joined emoji render as separate glyphs here; stored text untouched.
  • Regression test terminal_text_drops_format_characters_but_keeps_layout.

Inventory summary (full table on #3456)

Verification

  • Targeted: rustfmt --check clean on both files. Full test verification via CI on this PR (per queue-task discipline); new + existing terminal/text tests cover the change.

Autofix with [code]smith
Open in [code]smith · Need help on this PR? Tag @codesmith-bot with what you need.

…ips Cf

Contract (#3455): a plain-text field is row-safe only with no structure
character (Cc + U+2028/U+2029) and no format character (shared Cf set).
Disposition by surface kind: row renderers escape, stripping sanitizers
strip, ingest validators refuse. Shared set home: id-core unicode.rs,
Unicode 16.

Fix: world_ssh terminal_text also strips crate::is_format_char (was
Cc-only), with regression tests. All other inventory sites verified
conformant or deliberately-local; web/identity sanitize_name filed as a
follow-up (partial Cf strip).
@dezren39
dezren39 requested a review from a team as a code owner November 2, 2026 16:39
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Nov 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

You've used all free OSS reviews for now. Wait for the free limit to reset to keep reviewing this public repository.

Next included review available in 28 minutes.

Check out review usage here.

View limit details

Limit details: You’ve used the included review currently available.

Learn how review limits work.

Review configuration:

Run configuration
  • Source mode: Auto
  • Repository: Unavailable
  • Branch: Unavailable
  • File: No configuration file from this repository applied
  • Commit: Unavailable
  • Layers: defaults
  • Review profile: CHILL
  • Plan: Advanced
  • Run ID: e233cc77-ab70-4db0-a756-064d9ac8eee3
Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ee7d4de and 016cc35.

Files selected for processing: 2
  • pkgs/id/src/commands/text.rs
  • pkgs/id/src/world_ssh.rs
  • Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

Share

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Nov 2, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-11-02T16:40:40.930984Z 016cc35 PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant