Skip to content

ci(id): split basic push and full scheduled tiers - #4847

Open
dezren39 wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
queue/5619-3045-id-check-tiers
Open

dezren39 wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
queue/5619-3045-id-check-tiers

Conversation

@dezren39

@dezren39 dezren39 commented Nov 3, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary

push:                    guard + basic matrix + ARM64 snapshot + aggregator
schedule/workflow_dispatch: guard + full flake check

The full check no longer overlaps with the push-only basic tier. The guard remains unconditional, and the CI policy row now documents the main-only split. Closes #3045.

Evidence

  • Before: full-flake-check used event_name != pull_request, so it ran alongside the unconditional basic jobs for every configured event.
  • After: actionlint .github/workflows/id-check.yml, git diff --check, and targeted event-tier assertions pass.
  • Fresh post-merge push-run job evidence remains to be collected; the workflow intentionally has no PR trigger.

Merge Danger

Door: Two-way.

Blast Radius: Low — only event/job gating and CI policy documentation change; the existing push aggregator context and workflow triggers are preserved.


Autofix with [code]smith
Open in [code]smith · Need help on this PR? Tag @codesmith-bot with what you need.

@dezren39
dezren39 requested a review from a team as a code owner November 3, 2026 10:11
@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ⚠️ Failed 2026-11-03T10:11:10.483932Z
We couldn’t complete this review. Comment @codex review to try again.
5a6ea81 PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard.
To continue using code reviews, you can upgrade your account or add credits to your account and enable them for code reviews in your settings.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Nov 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

You've used all free OSS reviews for now. Wait for the free limit to reset to keep reviewing this public repository.

Next included review available in 10 minutes.

Check out review usage here.

View limit details

Limit details: You’ve used the included review currently available.

Learn how review limits work.

Review configuration:

Run configuration
  • Source mode: Auto
  • Repository: Unavailable
  • Branch: Unavailable
  • File: No configuration file from this repository applied
  • Commit: Unavailable
  • Layers: defaults
  • Review profile: CHILL
  • Plan: Advanced
  • Run ID: 79b5c2a5-f5d4-4502-8d9c-7aefccb59c81
Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4e3bd38 and 5a6ea81.

Files selected for processing: 2
  • .github/ci-policy.md
  • .github/workflows/id-check.yml
  • Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

Share

CodeRabbit Verify

  • Run CodeRabbit Verify to test the changes in this pull request.

This branch has not been deployed

No deployments
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

1 participant