[dezren39]

Design deliverable for #2024 (queue task 8136, LIST 5 synthesis of epic #2055).

Doc: doc/2026-11-03T15-10-56Z_design_task-placement-framework-v1/ — placement framework v1 merging all four input investigations:

• Decision table (§2): ordered Q1–Q7 / rules R1–R8 covering every option in investigate: placement framework — Muse vs GitHub Action vs Action→Jules vs OpenCode session vs OpenCode scheduled task vs Aster/Codex vs OpenClaw #2022's matrix (Muse, GitHub Action, Action→Jules, OpenCode session, OpenCode scheduled task, Aster/Codex, OpenClaw), with a mermaid flowchart — designed to be applied in under a minute per task. Includes the investigate: Jules scheduled tasks — what fits, and how Muse manages the schedule #2020 hard guard (never Jules/OpenClaw for secrets/local-state/held work) and investigate: OpenCode native scheduled tasks — creation, route choice, independence from Muse tokens #2019's finding (no native OpenCode scheduler; OS timer + opencode run).
• Shared-pool efficiency model (§3): pool inventory with the corrected pool map (one Meta pool, one door via the meta provider; Muse Power is not a session pool; ChatGPT plan shared by OpenCode OpenAI routes + Aster/Codex + OpenClaw), burn rules B1–B6 (soonest-expiring first, OpenAI final reserve, known-100% closed, stale read never idles, ≤60-min measurement gate, never PAYG), and supervision cost as the second price of every placement, with falsifiable predictions for the review round.
• Exceptions process (§4): E1–E5 — recorded, provisional nearest-rule placement, one-use/14-day expiry, third occurrence becomes a framework amendment, escalation only for genuinely Drew-owned decisions.

Follow-ups: every buildable item is filed or already tracked (§5 of the doc) — new: #4986 (machine-readable table + placement record, with the design's one PoC gated on this review) and #4988 (unified fleet schedule registry); already tracked: #2232, #2265, #2021, #1029/#2300/#2301/#2302/#2170, #1157/#1149.

Per the program pattern, #2024 stays open for the orchestrator review round — this PR references it and does not close it. No permanent feature is built here.

Refs #2024.

---

^{Open in [code]smith · Need help on this PR? Tag @codesmith-bot with what you need.}

[coderabbitai]

Warning

Review limit reached

You've used all free OSS reviews for now. Wait for the free limit to reset to keep reviewing this public repository.

Next included review available in 49 minutes.

Check out review usage here.

View limit details

Limit details: You’ve used the included review currently available.

Learn how review limits work.

Review configuration:

Run configuration

• Source mode: Auto
• Repository: Unavailable
• Branch: Unavailable
• File: No configuration file from this repository applied
• Commit: Unavailable
• Layers: defaults
• Review profile: CHILL
• Plan: Advanced
• Run ID: 6f79a423-88f2-4e76-b280-6679b0f660aa

Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b9e2eaf and c3acff4.

Files selected for processing: 1

• doc/2026-11-03T15-10-56Z_design_task-placement-framework-v1/2026-11-03T15-10-56Z_design_task-placement-framework-v1.md

• Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

CodeRabbit Verify

• Run CodeRabbit Verify to test the changes in this pull request.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review	Status	Commit	Review trigger
📝 Code Review	⚠️ Failed 2026-11-03T15:13:37.199648Z We couldn’t complete this review. Comment @codex review to try again.	c3acff4	PR opened

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard.
To continue using code reviews, you can upgrade your account or add credits to your account and enable them for code reviews in your settings.

[dezren39]

Codex disposition (queue task 8136): the Codex code review on this PR failed to run — Codex usage limits reached (summary comment 6607511492, status "Failed", and comment 6607512169 stating the usage limit). No review findings were produced: zero PR review comments and zero reviews exist on this head to disposition. This is the same repo-wide Codex limit recorded by earlier lanes today. Merging proceeds on the standing criteria instead: doc-only diff matching the task intent, PR MERGEABLE, verified against all four input deliverables on fresh reads.