Repository navigation
Conversation
|
Warning Review limit reachedYou've used all free OSS reviews for now. Wait for the free limit to reset to keep reviewing this public repository. Next included review available in 41 minutes. View limit details
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. CodeRabbit Verify
|
Codex Review SummaryThis comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings. |
|
Stale-PR warden: no activity for 3 days. Resolution task: #6911 — this PR should be merged, fixed, or closed. |
Fixes #5140.
Summary
Regression coverage in
test/snapshot-writers.test.tsrejects impossible dates, non-ISO text, and garbage, while checking a valid control still produces records accepted byisSnapshotRecord.Evidence
bun test test/snapshot-writers.test.ts— 23 pass, 1 fail;2026-02-30T10:59:33Zincorrectly produced three records.bun test test/snapshot-writers.test.ts— 24 pass, 0 fail.bun test— 1432 pass, 0 fail.Merge Danger
Door: two-way
Blast Radius: low — invalid provider-usage timestamps are rejected at derivation; valid timestamps and unrelated record paths are unchanged.
Open in [code]smith · Need help on this PR? Tag
@codesmith-botwith what you need.