[dezren39]

Summary

• Validate decoded note markers and resolution blocks before field access; report the offending file through fail().
• Add regression coverage for malformed JSON object shapes.

Closes #6857

Verification

• python3 -I -m unittest discover -s scripts/tests -p 'test_*workflow*.py' -v: research workflow suites passed; 119 passed, with one unrelated auto-format test failing.
• Confirmed the auto-format failure reproduces on clean main.
• git diff --check passed.

---

^{Open in [code]smith · Need help on this PR? Tag @codesmith-bot with what you need.}

[coderabbitai]

Warning

Review limit reached

You've used all free OSS reviews for now. Wait for the free limit to reset to keep reviewing this public repository.

Next included review available in 57 minutes.

Check out review usage here.

View limit details

Limit details: You’ve used the included review currently available.

Learn how review limits work.

Review configuration:

Run configuration

• Source mode: Auto
• Repository: Unavailable
• Branch: Unavailable
• File: No configuration file from this repository applied
• Commit: Unavailable
• Layers: defaults
• Review profile: CHILL
• Plan: Advanced
• Run ID: 2176d09c-fad7-4bb0-922e-7803e3413dab

Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 801ceb9 and aee3a73.

Files selected for processing: 4

• scripts/research_workflow.py
• scripts/research_workflow_live.py
• scripts/tests/test_research_workflow.py
• scripts/tests/test_research_workflow_live.py

• Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: aee3a739eb

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Preserve the new receipt payload while scanning resolutions

If any concept contains an existing resolution block for a different note, this assignment overwrites the receipt payload constructed above with that unrelated resolution. receipt_text(note, entry) then writes the previous note's disposition and JSON under the new note's receipt filename, ignoring the requested resolution. Subsequent check rejects the receipt, and retrying resolve-note is blocked because the file already exists. Use a separate variable for the scanned resolution so the validated receipt payload remains intact.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review Summary: ✅ Completed

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review	Status	Commit	Review trigger
📝 Code Review	✅ Completed 2026-11-08T02:24:54.005434Z	aee3a73	PR opened

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.