[dezren39]

Phase 2 amendment for #2753 (Drew, 2026-10-30: "should use contributor and disable all other muse meta providers and replace with this"). The proxy half (contributor-id resolution in direct mode) landed in #2762; the first wiring PR was #2761. This PR makes muse-direct the ONLY enabled Meta-family provider.

Changes (.opencode/opencode.jsonc only, switchboard mechanics — definitions stay full)

1. Contributor models: muse-direct now lists muse-spark-1.3-contributor and muse-wonder-1.0-contributor (replacing the plain ids from feat(opencode-config): add muse-direct provider via muse-proxy Responses passthrough (#2753) #2761), with the effort-variant set the meta block defines for its contributor models.
2. Other Meta doors off: disabled_providers gains "muse" ("meta" was already there). Both definitions remain complete below (meta: 10 models, muse: 4 models) — deleting a line re-enables either, per the switchboard rule. A dated note above the list records the supersession.
3. Route retargets (every Meta-pool reference outside the provider definitions; verified by a full-config walk — the list is exhaustive):
   • experimental.model_routes.spark-plan.targets[5]: muse/muse-spark-1.3 → muse-direct/muse-spark-1.3-contributor (reserve leaf, same last position; the pool's other leaves already seat contributor ids)
   • experimental.model_routes.workhorse-primary.targets[1]: muse/muse-spark-1.3 → muse-direct/muse-spark-1.3-contributor
   • experimental.model_routes.workhorse-primary.weights: key muse/muse-spark-1.3 → muse-direct/muse-spark-1.3-contributor (weight 1 unchanged)
   • experimental.model_routes.summit.targets[2]: muse/muse-wonder-1.0#max → muse-direct/muse-wonder-1.0-contributor#max (#max variant preserved, same chain position)
   • The dated comment at each retargeted route was updated to match. No other references exist: agent defaults seat opencode-route/* pools, and the meta/… strings inside the Cloudflare AI Gateway / CommandCode provider catalogs are those providers' own upstream model ids, not references to this config's meta provider — deliberately untouched.

Validation

JSONC parses after the change; post-change walk shows zero meta//muse/ references outside provider definitions, meta+muse disabled, muse-direct enabled. Laptop deployment (hardlinked deployed config) + throwaway-serve verification (muse-direct the only enabled Meta provider; content-verified contributor session at ~10 input tokens) and the named-meta quota continuity read are reported on #2753.

---

^{Need help on this PR? Tag @codesmith-bot with what you need.}

[coderabbitai]

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Commit to this branch
• Create a new PR

• Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review	Status	Commit	Review trigger
📝 Code Review	✅ Completed 2026-10-30T14:13:26.046058Z	a0c6794	PR opened

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.