Skip to content

fix(aggregator): charges producer — reject declined alerts and amount-due-only invoices (#3120) - #3193

Merged
dezren39 merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
queue/4577-3120-charges-declined-due
Oct 31, 2026
Merged

dezren39 merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
queue/4577-3120-charges-declined-due

Conversation

@dezren39

@dezren39 dezren39 commented Oct 31, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary

Fixes #3120 (queue task 4577; triage task 4540 CONFIRMED both shapes on main).

The Gmail charges producer turned two NOT-a-charge shapes into charge candidates:

  1. Declined/failed purchase alerts — isNotChargeSubject had no declined/failed pattern, so "Your $20.00 purchase at OpenAI was declined" parsed amount + merchant via the at/was fallback and became a candidate.
  2. Amount-due-only invoices — amountFromBody's bare-amount fallback accepted an "Amount due $20.00" body with no paid/charged evidence.

Changes (pm-stack/aggregator/scripts/produce-charge-candidates.ts)

Tests (pm-stack/aggregator/test/produce-charge-candidates.test.ts)

9 new tests pin: declined alert gated, failed-payment alert gated, amount-due subject gated, genuine purchase alert + receipt subject still charges, amount-due-only and balance-due-only bodies yield no amount, paid evidence wins when due language is also present, genuine receipt body still yields its amount.

Verified on the laptop worktree: targeted file 14/14 pass; charges suite (catalog/collect/feed-gate/match/push + producer) 42/42 pass. (Local tsc in the fresh worktree lacks installed bun types — a deps-not-installed artifact; CI typechecks with deps.)


View with [code]smith Autofix with [code]smith
Need help on this PR? Tag @codesmith-bot with what you need.

@dezren39
dezren39 requested a review from a team as a code owner October 31, 2026 19:20
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Oct 31, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

You've used all free OSS reviews for now. Wait for the free limit to reset to keep reviewing this public repository.

Next included review available in 26 minutes.

Check out review usage here.

View limit details

Limit details: You’ve used the included review currently available.

Learn how review limits work.

Review configuration:

Run configuration
  • Source mode: Auto
  • Repository: Unavailable
  • Branch: Unavailable
  • File: No configuration file from this repository applied
  • Commit: Unavailable
  • Layers: defaults
  • Review profile: CHILL
  • Plan: Advanced
  • Run ID: 47933eb9-aeee-41ce-9140-b413bc94b513
Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 236cb98 and d6dfa4c.

Files selected for processing: 2
  • pm-stack/aggregator/scripts/produce-charge-candidates.ts
  • pm-stack/aggregator/test/produce-charge-candidates.test.ts
  • Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

Share

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Oct 31, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-10-31T19:51:13.163401Z d6dfa4c Manual request
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 368faabff0

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

@dezren39

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@codex review

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Delightful!

Reviewed commit: d6dfa4c1d4

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

fix(aggregator): charges producer turns declined purchase alerts and outstanding invoices into charge candidates (PR #2149)

1 participant